August 20, 2021
"Nuclear Power – No Thanks!" Most people are likely familiar with this slogan. When it comes to nuclear power, many associate it with contaminated areas and nuclear explosions. However, nuclear power is one of the most environmentally friendly and low-emission methods of energy generation. Let’s take a closer look at this.
Nuclear Power – Yes, Please!
Compared to fossil fuels, which release significant amounts of CO₂, nuclear power generates no harmful greenhouse gas emissions during its operation. Uranium, thorium, and other nuclear fuels are available in sufficient quantities to meet humanity's energy needs for many centuries. Unlike fossil fuels, nuclear energy thus represents a potentially inexhaustible energy source.
If you’re now thinking that nuclear waste is the primary problem, that’s an issue of the past. Modern technologies have made significant advances in the recycling of radioactive materials. Modern reactors can already use recycled fuel, which greatly reduces the amount of material requiring final disposal. New reactor designs are constantly being developed, becoming increasingly efficient.
Safety
The nuclear accidents at Chernobyl and Fukushima have highlighted the importance of safety. Don’t worry – humanity learns from its mistakes. Both the nuclear industry and regulatory bodies have learned from these events and made progress in reactor safety and safety protocols. New generations of nuclear power plants, such as the fourth generation of pressurized water reactors, are equipped with improved safety features. They are designed to automatically shut down in the event of an accident, reducing the likelihood of a meltdown.
Public Perception is a Major Issue
Despite the numerous advantages of nuclear energy, there are several reasons why it faces rejection in some countries. Often, political decisions and public perception hinder the expansion of this energy source. Some countries may lack sufficient expertise or scientific education, while others consciously ignore scientific facts. Some simply want to be opposed to nuclear power.
In addition to the predominantly negative public opinion, costs are often a significant reason for the rejection of nuclear energy. The construction of new nuclear power plants involves substantial expenses. There needs to be a serious investment here. However, a possible approach would be to at least utilize and renovate existing nuclear power plants instead of shutting them down, as is currently being discussed in Germany.
Focus on Other Renewable Energy Sources
Unfortunately, the current focus is not on nuclear energy. Instead, other renewable energy sources such as wind power, solar energy, and geothermal energy are gaining prominence. And that’s great, too. These technologies have also evolved in recent years and have become increasingly cost-effective. The declining costs of installing and operating wind and solar installations make them attractive alternatives to nuclear energy. Another significant advantage of these alternative energy sources is independence from large energy suppliers.
Related Links
Nuclear Energy: Just the Facts
https://www.nei.org/resources/fact-sheets/nuclear-energy-just-the-facts
Nuclear Newswire
https://www.ans.org/news/
Repository superfluous: New nuclear technology can recycle atomic waste
https://dual-fluid.com/en/
World Nuclear News
https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/
Closing Words
While nuclear energy offers significant benefits such as low CO₂ emissions and energy security, the trend is likely to shift towards alternative energy sources. I hope this article has helped debunk at least a few myths.